Apparels Values: On Age, Political and Social Position

by admin

June 10, 2021

“Fashion functions as a mirror to our times, so it is inherently political,” notes Andrew Bolton. It is the state-of-the-art projection of the views and opinions perpetrated by the nation and its people. Our clothes bear the emissary of all that is acceptable and objectionable. The dirt of these bearings is what-is-up in the matters of age and social position.

All these factors shouldn’t but seem to constitute our identity. The clothes when ‘appropriate’ in the eyes of the society can function as indemnity. When threatened, the existing patterns of clothes un-apposite for a certain age, for a certain nationality, for a certain religious background and even body measurement, can push you into the blazing furnace.

These are the parameters that rule our social and political discourse, and wickedly so are reserved mostly for women folk! Our Purush Pradhan Samaj does not govern the samaj (society) but the women in it. It has settled its ‘respect and dignity’ (sic) on the bodies of us women. Implicating that it is rebellious to wield autonomy over our own bodies, hence, we need to follow and update ourselves with what the current newsflash of misogyny has to say about what we wear!

Let’s break down the parameters to ‘educate’ ourselves as to what gigantic danger we are posing by exercising our right to choose what we wear on our own bodies. Let’s talk about age and social position.

Age. A human construct to measure emotional and physical strength along with sensibility and intelligence. By that definition, it surpasses the authority to measure anything by that scale. It poses obstacles in the matters of clothing too. Clothes become central to the affirmations of our ageing, and the process is not made any easier by the fashion industry. It demonstrates a way to experience age in a way that makes you conform than makes you comfortable. It is after all about the people around to see, uphold and carry forward the demarcation of what is considered ‘proper’. A dress needs to be presented, experienced and understood within a culture in a way that makes the people invisible rather than stand out. A dress needs to form a significant, and yet neglected element in the constitution of old age.

The masochistic catalogue is surely updated with a modernization of the apparels, but are molded into the baking pan of confines. In India they hybridize to accommodate the glorious traditions of pardah and hypocritical proclamation of a progressive society. All in all, a politicized body of a woman fits into the garb of ignorance and abuse.

Fashion does not exist in vacuum; it is pulled onto the podium to be analysed and made meaning of. It is given the power of explaining oneself in more than just words. It is made liable to justify one’s action and thoughts. That is why the term came into existence, power dressing.

Former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto was deconstructed and reconstructed just on the basis of what she wore. Being a female in our country rotting with gender-based regulation, it was not her position that was dissected but her body. A woman is attacked for her success and accomplishments but the medium of this attack is her body.  The world knows it well what it has bruised with the centuries of conditioning, can be beaten dead with a last strike.

Serena Williams was criticised for wearing a black catsuit at the French Open, as late as in 2018. The outfit seemed too provocative for it drew denunciation from Bernard Giudicelli, the French Tennis Federation president. According to him, the bodysuit was disrespectful to the sport of tennis. His retort only aided to pinpoint the strain of elitism and male gaze within the sport.

She is interpreted and deciphered on her apparel so that their conscience does not bow down in shame because of her words. She is put on a scale of morality based on what she wears. She becomes an outcast on the basis of convenience in the Man’s World.

Not Acceptable!

About the Author


Related Posts

Call out or Not, that is the Question

Call out or Not, that is the Question

The basis of the evolution of call-out culture has taken a political turn. It no longer constricts itself to the righteous argument of it, nor has it remained just a human urge to point out the wrong in others. Call-out culture has become more common on social media...

My Pride through and through

My Pride through and through

I would rather take up the theories of psychology in this case which says, no two people’s psyche is the same. There are as many psychologies as there are people. Similarly, we stand by the theory, rather make this our idiom, there are as many sexualities as there are people.

National Identity and Apparel Industry

India has been a country of origination for multitudes of crafts and textiles designing, productions, methodologies and techniques. 29 states and 7 union territories comprise thousands of flairs and a million elegances. The community living in the asian subcontinent...

Character of thy Clothes

Stella Bruzzi once said, “Clothes are not mere accessories, but are key elements in the construction of cinematic identities”. It is not just apparel but an assertion of oneself. It gives women a voice and a platform to make it sonorous.
A cinematic identity bears our burden of setting out to recreate our own identity. This identity is deciphered and manifested in the apparels of the characters. It is the attire they wear that becomes symbolic of who they are supposed to be, and how they are supposed to make us feel.

Join for the Latest Updates on New Litters!


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need Help?